Quantcast
Channel: Jack Dorsey
Viewing all 704 articles
Browse latest View live

Jack Dorsey And Twitter: Can You Have A Part-Time Product Visionary?

$
0
0

New York Times technology writer Nick Bilton has published a profile of Twitter CEO Dick Costolo, and the challenges the company is facing as it tries to transform itself from a real-time information network into an advertising-driven media entity. But one of the interesting things about the piece isn’t what it tells us about Costolo or his background as an improvisational comedian — it’s the details that Bilton includes about the lack of involvement of Twitter’s co-founder andalleged product visionary, Jack Dorsey.

Although he was brought back into the company (with much fanfare) to help guide the product’s evolution, Dorsey is apparently not really involved with day-to-day decisions any more. So who is Twitter’s product visionary now, and what does that mean for the future of the service? According to Bilton, the co-founder has stepped back from having more of a day-to-day role within the company, in part because other employees said he was difficult to deal with and found his product direction confusing. As the NYT writer puts it:

Click here to read more>

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


Jack Dorsey Confirms He No Longer Has An Operational Role At Twitter

$
0
0

jack dorsey

This just in from Jack Dorsey's personal blog:

There was a great profile in the New York Times about Twitter’s CEO, Dick Costolo, which mentioned my work at the company. It’s not a common arrangement, so I’d like to clarify a few points.

In Spring of 2011, Dick asked me to take an operational role overseeing product, design, and brand. Our shared goal was to get those organizations back under him as soon as possible, simply because it was the right thing to do for the company. We moved all of my reports back under him in January of this year after leadership was firmly in place. This allowed me to focus on refining our brand and logo, to work more with Dick and the leadership team on our direction forward, and ultimately return the majority of my time to Square, where I’m CEO. I’m back to going to Twitter on Tuesday afternoons, something I started before taking the interim operational role.

We haven’t talked about this publicly because it’s not what people using Twitter every day care about.

I’m fortunate in life to be a part of two foundational and mission-driven organizations, and I’m always going fight like hell to make them thrive. And they are! Now back to our work.

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Anyone Saying He Can Run Two Companies Is Lying To You Or Himself

$
0
0

Can we finally stop pretending someone can run two companies if they just work hard enough or are brilliant enough?

I’m looking at you Jack Dorsey, Twitter CEO Dick Costolo, Twitter investor Peter Fenton, and everyone else who spent years arguing that it was totally doable. In various interviews and private conversations throughout 2011, people close to Twitter consistently maintained it was no big deal that Dorsey could build Square — one of the single most ambitious, capital- and execution-heavy startups of our day — and run product at Twitter — a company that was woefully behind on any meaningful product innovation and desperately needed a visionary leader.

Click here to read more>

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Here's How To Make A Quick $140 Off Of One Of Silicon Valley's Top Entrepreneurs

$
0
0

Jack Dorsey, CEO, Square

Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, who recently invested in payments startup Square and joined its board, recently asked Jack Dorsey, its CEO, why it called people who buy or sell things with Square "users."

Dorsey didn't have a good answer.

So he's asked his employees to start calling its customers, well, "customers"—or, specifically, "buyers" and "Sellers." He's also suggested the rest of the technology industry consider making the change, too.

If he slips up, Square employees who catch him can charge him $140. We assume that figure is a nod to Dorsey's other company, Twitter, which limits messages to 140 characters.

One problem with Dorsey's theory: A lot of Internet companies give away services for free and make money through advertising or other means. Their users aren't their customers. One big example: Twitter, where Dorsey is still chairman. We've asked folks there what they think of Dorsey's missive.

Here's the email Dorsey sent Square employees:

Team,
I was reminded of something today which has always bothered me, which I have since taken for granted.

The entire technology industry uses the word “user” to describe its customers. While it might be convenient, “users” is a rather passive and abstract word. No one wants to be thought of as a “user” (or “consumer” for that matter). I certainly don’t. And I wouldn’t consider my mom a “user” either, she’s my mom. The word “user” abstracts the actual individual. This may seem like a small and insignificant detail that doesn’t matter, but the vernacular and words we use here at Square set a very strong and subtle tone for everything we do. So let’s now part ways with our industry and rethink this.

The word “customer” is a much more active and bolder word. It’s honest and direct. It immediately suggests a relationship we must deliver on. And our customers think of their customers in the same way.

We have two types of customers: sellers and buyers. So when we need to be more specific, we’ll use one of those two words.

The other thing that has surfaced in a number of my 1:1s is that we have become a bit abstract and distanced from our customers. Simply: we don’t talk about them enough. So, we’re going to do two things.

First, I’m going to work with the support team to surface top issues at every Town Square instead of just CS inquiries per transaction percentages. And on our information radiators. We must feel our customer’s issues every day.

Second, all of our work is in service of our customers. Period. Therefore, we better damn well mention them in every conversation, review, meeting, goal, etc. I expect all of you to make certain our customers are always the first and only focus of all our efforts. If there is an egregious absence of this focus anywhere in the company, tell me and we will correct. If I ever say the word “user” again, immediately charge me $140.

From this moment forward, let’s stop distancing ourselves from the people that choose our products over our competitors. We don’t have users, we have customers we earn. They deserve our utmost respect, focus, and service. Because that’s who we are.

Jack

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Jack Dorsey: Stop Calling Them 'Users'

$
0
0

Twitter and Square cofounder Jack Dorsey

Square CEO Jack Dorsey is over calling his customers "users."

That's because "users" simply doesn't fully encapsulate who Square's customers are.

In a blog post, Dorsey notes the two definitions of a "user." First, there's the standard definition of "a person who operates something" and then there's the less appealing definition, "a person who takes illegal drugs."

Dorsey says it's time for the tech industry as a whole to reconsider the word "user."

"While the intent is to consider people first, the result is a massive abstraction away from real problems people feel on a daily basis," Dorsey says. "An abstraction away from simply building something you would love to see in the world, and the hope that others desire the same."

Dorsey is banning the term "users" from Square's vocabulary and hopes that other tech companies will follow suit. He says he will replace that term with "customers" and when the company needs to get even more specific, will use "buyers," and "sellers." 

And if any of Square's employees catch Dorsey utter the word "user," they can charge him $140. 

Don't Miss: Here's How To Make A Quick $140 Off Of One Of Silicon Valley's Top Entrepreneurs >

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Do You Have What It Takes to Disrupt an Entire Industry?

$
0
0

What extraordinary abilities does Jack Dorsey possess that have enabled him to tackle and disrupt the payment processing industry?

Certainly nothing in the Twitter co-founder’s career history hinted that after conquering the social media world, he would build a successful disruptive payments company—much less  one that is valued at more than $1 billion by investors just three years in.

Square, a free dongle that attaches to any smartphone or tablet, allows users to accept credit card payments for a nominal 2.75 percent fee, without lengthy applications to fill out, background checks or setup fees.

Likewise, the hugely popular on-demand car service Uber wasn’t born out of a transportation company. iStock Photo wasn’t spun out of Getty Images, Airbnb wasn’t incubated by Starwood Properties or Hilton—and my company 99designs wasn’t a fancy design agency creation.

Regardless of what industry you examine, you’ll find it’s typically not the experienced players—the people with existing high-powered relationships within their target industries and multi-million dollar R&D budgets — who end up creating the “next great thing.”

Why is it that established companies fail to innovate, despite lofty mission statements, massive R&D teams and budgets, and deep industry connections?

It comes down to what I think of as the “we’ve always done it this way” syndrome. A payments company like First Data likely couldn’t begin to imagine doing away with setup fees, monthly statement fees, terminal rental charges and an arduous and painful application process that can take weeks. After all, they – along with every other payment provider – have created successful, profitable mega-companies by following a set formula. Why on earth deviate?

More often than not, it takes an outsider with little to lose to see things differently, tackle and eliminate the pain points in an existing industry, simplify processes and cut costs. After all, it wasn’t eHarmony or Match.com that decided to launch a free, ad-supported dating site, figuring they just might pull in significant revenue. Instead, Markus Frind created POF (formerly known as PlentyOfFish) as a recent college graduate, and manned the dating site for four years on his own before making a hire.

It’s now a multi-million dollar business with 30 million members who send an average of 15 million messages to one another a day and rack up a collective 10 billion page views monthly.

Of course, there are plenty of outsiders who have launched “disruptive” companies that, in reality, did so little disrupting that they quickly fizzled out. We only hear about those that shake things up so severely that the affected industry will never be the same again – the equivalent of, say, a magnitude-7 earthquake hitting a major city. So what’s the key to success for outsiders who manage to go big and win big?

Questioning the status quo, cutting costs, eliminating hassles, bypassing middle-men, and removing fees certainly go a long way. But being naïve, clueless or wildly – and perhaps inappropriately – ambitious also helps.

When my company SitePoint became the first major Web design book publisher in 2002 to sell millions of dollars worth of books a year direct-to-consumer (rather than relying on distributors and retailers), the company was executing a business model that was a 180-degree spin from traditional publishing houses like O’Reilly, Wiley and Pearson, which relied on retail stores for the majority of their sales and revenue.

According to the Harvard Business Review, disruptive companies earn 20x more money than their stay-the-course peers. Those peers moan and groan – and may even hire high-paid Washington lobbyists to try to keep their new competitors at bay. Some continue to fight relentlessly, while others finally just whip out their wallets. Witness Getty Images’ acquisition of iStock Photo in 2006 after seeing how successful a crowdsourced professional photography company that sells images from millions of independent photographers via a self-service platform could be.

In a similar vein, Match.com bought POF free-dating competitor OkCupid in 2011 (much to the grousing of many OkCupidites.) But many disruptors aren’t selling out. And who knows—we may soon find that they’re the ones buying.

Where will you find the disruptors of tomorrow? Everywhere—literally. Step outside, cast a glance skyward and you just might catch sight of a plane operated by newcomer SurfAir.com, an all-you-can-fly airline serving popular California cities (for starters) including Palo Alto and Los Angeles. Founded by Wade Eyerly, 33, who previously worked as a National Security Agency consultant, Department of Defense intelligence officer and political campaign worker, the airline provides members with unlimited short-haul flights on a private plane without the hassles associated with traditional airlines such as security, check-in counters, crying babies or toddlers who kick your seat.

Eyerly is undoubtedly shooting high. Yet SurfAir is a disruptive idea that just may—to the chagrin of the major airlines—take off. Will yours? There’s only one way to find out.

Matt Mickiewicz started his first company while still in high school, and has leveraged his early success into three profitable businesses which have have published 50+ web design books in 20 languages, paid designers over $30 million for their graphic design work through 99designs, and helped entrepreneurs sell over $60 million in websites and domain names on Flippa.

The Young Entrepreneur Council (YEC) is an invite-only nonprofit organization comprised of the world’s most promising young entrepreneurs. In partnership with Citi, the YEC recently launched #StartupLab, a free virtual mentorship program that helps millions of entrepreneurs start and grow businesses via live video chats, an expert content library and email lessons.

Read more posts on Young Entrepreneur Council »

Please follow War Room on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

A Key Twitter Backer Just Ripped The Lid Off Its Executive Turmoil

$
0
0

Chris Sacca

Twitter's investors fired cofounders Jack Dorsey and Ev Williams as CEO in a messy, unfair fashion, according to Chris Sacca, an early advisor and investor who now runs a fund devoted to private trades of Twitter shares.

He made the comments in an on-stage interview at the PandoMonthly event series in Los Angeles Thursday night.

Jack Dorsey, Twitter's first CEO, who now serves as its executive chairman, was fired in 2008. The reasons insiders give vary, but they center around Dorsey's inability to manage Twitter's frequent outages; botched communication with the board about a buyout offer Twitter got from Facebook; and Williams's increasing interest in running the fast-growing company as it was starting to take off.

“I don’t think the way Jack was fired was fair,” Sacca said in the interview, a video of which is available on PandoDaily. “I was there. I was an advisor to the company. I was consulted on it. And the original plan was to send him on his way."*

Sacca said that Dick Costolo, a former Google executive who was also an investor and advisor to the company, insisted that Dorsey maintain the title of chairman and be well-compensated.

Sacca said Costolo wanted to make sure Dorsey didn't "feel screwed" in the process. It's odd that Costolo had so much authority at Twitter back then.

Costolo went on to become COO of Twitter. In 2010, he was promoted to CEO. Williams took on a role overseeing Twitter's product. And Dorsey quietly returned to the company, moonlighting at Twitter while also running Square, the payments startup he had cofounded in exile.

In part because of Dorsey's return, Williams never actually returned to an active role at Twitter. In March 2011, Twitter acknowledged Dorsey's return.

Williams was never formally fired, but he stopped showing up to work.

“The way shit went down around Ev … ultimately Ev just chose to leave,” Sacca said.

Williams retained his seat on the board and is the largest investor in Twitter, which was most recently valued at more than $8 billion in its latest private financing.

Twitter's cofounders rarely discuss their firings. In a rare interview, Dorsey told Vanity Fair last year that his removal as CEO was like "getting punched in the stomach."

More recently, Dorsey and Williams have taken steps toward reconciliation. Over the summer, they dined together in San Francisco.

And these days, Dorsey spends considerably less time at Twitter, leaving the company solidly in Costolo's hands.

The company's third cofounder, Biz Stone, is now running a startup incubator with Williams.

Sacca didn't mention Noah Glass, an often-forgotten cofounder.

The company has a boilerplate statement it repeats when asked about its founders' ousters:

Twitter’s three co-founders—Ev Williams, Biz Stone, and Jack—have unselfishly played whatever role was most needed at the time to nurture the company and help the product reach its full potential.

We've invited Twitter to update that statement in light of Sacca's comments.

NOTE: In the original version of this post, we inferred that Sacca had said that Ev Williams and Twitter's other board members were behind the plan to oust Jack Dorsey. Sacca did not specify this. We apologize for the mistake.

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

How Dick Costolo Deals With Challenge Of Leading Twitter Without Being Its Founder

$
0
0

Twitter CEO Dick Costolo at Innovation Uncensored

Twitter CEO Dick Costolo is not a company founder, and that presents a challenge.

People at tech companies naturally look to founders for direction, he observed at Fast Company's Innovation Uncensored conference in San Francisco Thursday morning. At Twitter, two cofounders, Ev Williams and Jack Dorsey, are still on the board.

The way Twitter solved this: Dorsey declared that he considered Costolo a founder.

That move gave Costolo what he called "moral authority" to make "absurd" requests.

"Founders have moral authority to make absurd requests of the team," said Costolo. "When Jack says, 'Think of Dick as a founder,' what he's really doing is letting the company know, 'I anoint Dick with the permission to make unreasonable requests of you.' There's a helpful gravitational pull that leads the team to nod their heads and say, 'Okay, we'll figure out how to do that.'"

Costolo, by all accounts, has put an end to a long period of unrest and turmoil at the information network. The company, whose most recent outside investment valued it at $8 billion, is now expected to do $350 million in advertising this year.

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


Jack Dorsey's Life Lessons

$
0
0

Jack Dorsey's Life Lessons

These days, Jack Dorsey, the chairman of Twitter and CEO of Square, gives speeches at conferences and posts 140-character koans of business wisdom.

But in Twitter's younger days, he dispensed a far more homespun kind of wisdom.

Caroline Mizumoto, an early Twitter employee, printed out a copy of "Jack's Life Lessons."

"Jack posted the life lessons on an old blog years ago," Mizumoto told us. "It's been deleted but I liked it so much I put it on my fridge and posted it on Flickr."

The lessons:

  • Don't be a jerk
  • Don't take anyone for granted
  • Enjoy the moment
  • Be honest, always
  • Be humble
  • Be kind
  • Respect people's wishes
  • Allow endings
  • Fail openly
  • Have an amazing haircut

For the last one, Dorsey recommends Geno's Barberia:

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Jack Dorsey's iPhone Home Screen Is Kind Of Boring

$
0
0

Twitter and Square co-founder Jack Dorseytweeted a screenshot of his iPhone home screen over the weekend. And it's kind of boring. 

Aside from some news apps, the only third-party apps he has are his own: Twitter and Pay With Square. He even uses Apple Maps instead of Google Maps! And then there's that plain black background...

Maybe Dorsey should check out some of our recommendations for alternatives to Apple's built-in apps.

Here it is:

jack dorsey's iphone home screen

Please follow SAI: Tools on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Jack Dorsey Is Spending His Holidays On A Yacht In St Barts With A Model

$
0
0

Jack Dorsey was spotted on Sunday by paparazzi in St Barts.

The Square founder was on a luxury yacht with British model and acress, Lily Cole.

Cole played Greta in Snow White and the Huntsman.

Why do the paparazzi care about Jack Dorsey?

They don't, really. They were after Cole, who nearly lost her bikini top in the waves, and Dorsey happened to be in the photos. The Daily Mail, which ran the photo of Cole and Dorsey together, didn't even know who Dorsey was. It called him  Cole's "mystery man."

The Kernal recognized Dorsey and wondered if the pair was dating. But it's the only shot we've seen of them together, and they weren't alone on the yacht. The only other photo with Dorsey from Sunday was hands off.

Here's a screenshot, below. (Click to enlarge)

lily cole jack dorsey

 

lily cole jack dorsey

Here's what Cole looks like. Her modeling career began at age 14 and by age 16 she was on the cover of British Vogue.

lily cole

Dorsey isn't the first tech executive to be spotted with a model. Joshua Kushner, founder of Thrive Capital and an Instagram investor, is reportedly dating a Victoria's Secret model, Karlie Kloss.

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Twitter Is Now Trading At $11 Billion On The Private Markets

$
0
0

Jack Dorsey on CNBC

A new report by Greencrest Capital saysTwitter is prepping for an IPO—not this year, but likely in 2014.

That squares with what Twitter chairman Jack Dorsey told CNBC late last year: The company is getting ready for an initial public offering at a time of its choosing.

And Twitter recently upgraded its management, promoting CFO Ali Rowghani, a veteran of Pixar, to COO, and hiring away Zynga treasurer Mike Gupta to replace him.

While Twitter's not yet public, its shares are traded on secondary markets. Based on recent trades, the company hit a notional valuation of $11 billion, Greencrest analyst Max Woolf told Forbes.

The company's most recent financing, in 2011, valued the company at $8 billion. It subsequently rose to $10 billion in private trading, but fallout from the Facebook IPO knocked it back down below $9 billion last summer.

Because secondary markets are illiquid compared to public markets, these private valuations aren't entirely predictive of a business's future value as a public company. But consider this: 10 months ago, Facebook stock changed hands at $29.30 a share. It's now at $28.

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Solving Problems The Square Way

$
0
0

Not long ago, Square CEO Jack Dorsey challenged his team to create a solution for accepting payments at Starbucks, which the mobile-payments company had partnered with in August. When an engineer worked out a solution (using QR codes within the Square Wallet app that could tap into Starbucks' preexisting system), Dorsey was so giddy that he grabbed a high-end bottle of scotch off his desk and gave it to the engineer as a reward. The only catch? As both would soon learn, the bottle of alcohol was worth a lot more than Dorsey had initially realized--roughly $2,000.

Now, as the tale around the office goes, every time Dorsey retells the story, the price of the bottle keeps shooting higher and higher--an anecdote Dorsey facetiously uses to highlight his unmatched generosity toward employees. "It became like Gob's suits in Arrested Development," the engineer told me with a smile on a recent visit to Square's headquarters.

Click here to read more >

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

After Disagreements With Jack Dorsey, Square COO Keith Rabois Is Out (SBUX)

$
0
0

Jack Dorsey and Keith Rabois of Square

Square COO Keith Rabois has resigned after running the online-payments startup through two years of hypergrowth, according to a statement he gave AllThingsD.

AllThingsD's Kara Swisher reported that "disagreements" between Rabois and Square founder and CEO Jack Dorsey were "part of the reason" Rabois left.

As recently as September, Dorsey was effusive in his praise for Rabois. In a speech at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference, he said Rabois deserved to be called a "founder" of Square for his dedication to the company.

At an event that same month held by Technology Review, Dorsey also said that "discord" within companies should be avoided, as such disagreements inevitably expressed themselves in products. Dorsey is a fan of simple, elegant product design.

Square now has about 500 employees and is processing the annual equivalent of more than $10 billion in payments, a figure which does not include a deal it has to handle Square's debit- and credit-card payments. It is moving to a new headquarters soon. It raised $200 million from investors including Citi and Starbucks in a deal that valued the company at $3.2 billion.

Here's Rabois's statement, which suggests the former PayPal and Slide executive and Yelp board member has found a new gig already:

It is amazing what Square has accomplished since August of 2010. When I joined, there were 17 engineers all reporting flatly to Jack. The local coffee shop served as our interview room. Leading our amazing crew has been the most rewarding professional journey of my life. I am forever grateful to Jack, for his confidence in me and to each and every member of the team for allowing me to learn from them.
But every day matters. And it is better at this point for me to be doing something different every day.
As a result, I’ve decided to resign from Square. I am very excited about what lies ahead for the company. Square could not be better poised for greatness.

I will have more to share about my next opportunity soon.

Dorsey gave this statement:

Today I accepted Keith’s resignation from Square. When he joined, we had fewer than 30 employees and under 1000 active merchants. Today, over 3 million individuals and businesses are able to accept credit cards with Square, processing over $10 billion annually. We couldn’t have done it without him and we wish him well in his next opportunity.

This is not the only tumultuous change the company has gone through at the top—some not as well noted or understood at the time they happened.

When Khosla Ventures invested in Square in 2009, it won the right to name a member of Square's board.

In the spring of 2011, the investor behind that deal, Gideon Yu, left Khosla, but was said to be "likely" to remain on Square's board; he former YouTube and Facebook CFO had been working out of Square's offices once a week and serving as the company's shadow CFO.

Khosla Ventures founder Vinod Khosla replaced Yu on the board a few months later, around the same time that Dorsey began splitting his time between Square and Twitter, the information network he also founded and previously ran as CEO until his ouster in 2008. Dorsey's dual role has been a point of contention inside both companies, though most recently he has focused his time and attention on Square.

Recently Square revised its articles of incorporation to eliminate Khosla Ventures' right to name a board member, though Khosla himself remains on the board. (As a major shareholder, Khosla can participate in the election of a pool of board members.)

Khosla and Square did not comment on the change in board structure.

Square recently hired Sarah Friar, a former Goldman Sachs analyst and Salesforce.com executive, as CFO; she will be acting COO, the company said.

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

BlackRock Buys A Stake In Twitter From Employees

$
0
0

New Twitter HQ Jack Dorsey Dick Costolo Golden Gate Bridge

As Twitter slowly prepares for a public offering, BlackRock, the money-management firm, is taking a small stake in the company by buying shares from early employees.

The Financial Times reports that BlackRock is spending $80 million for a little under 1 percent of the company, valuing the whole at $9 billion.

That's a lower price than investors paid in deals last year that valued Twitter at $11 billion, but those involved smaller blocks of shares. Private-market transactions also tend to be volatile, given the lack of liquidity.

Twitter recently promoted its CFO, Ali Rowghani, to COO, and hired Zynga executive Mike Gupta to fill the CFO role. Twitter chairman Jack Dorsey and CEO Dick Costolo have described the company as preparing itself to go public, but deliberately and at a time of their choosing.

Costolo has also said that Twitter has a "truckload" of money still in the bank. So until a public offering happens, purchases from employees are likely to be the main source of shares for investors who want a stake in the company.

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


San Francisco Needs To Stop Apologizing For Being The Best City On The Planet (GOOG, FB)

$
0
0

Jack Dorsey in "Where the World Changes"

Yes, San Francisco is getting expensive, and more so all the time.

But really—we're going to blame Google's buses for the city's housing crisis?

That's what writer Rebecca Solnit argues in an utterly ridiculous screed in the London Review of Books that pretends to be about the crisis of capitalism in San Francisco but turns out to be a handwringing diatribe about her search for a home to buy.

The reason why house prices in San Francisco are going up is because the supply is limited and the demand is insatiable.

The supply is limited because of archaic zoning rules and cultural attitudes toward growth.

The demand is unlimited because San Francisco has become the red-hot center of the world's technology industry, with jobs growing in and around the city, while retaining its natural beauty, cultural delights, and singular tolerance for oddballs of all stripes.

Yes, the trash situation is absurd, and public transit is atrocious. But that brings me to my main point: It is monumentally stupid to complain about a brilliant innovation like workplace shuttles when the real problem holding back San Francisco is private cars and the way we accommodate them.

The reason why Google, Apple, Facebook, and other tech companies have instituted shuttles to carry employees to and from San Francisco to their Silicon Valley campuses is because they cannot retain employees who are forced to slog in traffic for an hour or more a day, each way—then spend almost as much time circling trying to find scarce parking when they get home.

Meanwhile, the reason why those campuses exist is because the suburbs are the only places where they can situate low-slung office buildings surrounded by seas of parking lots.

There's an easy way to fix this: Stop allowing companies to give employees free parking at work, and stop requiring parking in housing developments in San Francisco. In fact, San Francisco ought to rewrite its zoning to discourage parking in all new housing developments, if not ban it altogether.

Here's a news flash: If you don't require parking in apartment buildings, you can build more space for human beings, at less cost.

Yes, that might raise more demand for public and private transit. Google might have to put even more shuttles on the road—horrors!

And San Francisco's nascent alternative-transportation industry—everything from Uber to SideCar and Lyft and Getaround—might get a boost in its home city. (Heaven forfend we create any jobs, since those people will require housing and transportation.)

San Francisco was recently ranked the 7th happiest city in the world—and the happiest city in the United States.

And Solnit and 49ers fans aside, residents are developing some much-needed and -deserved civic pride, as Mayor Ed Lee highlighted at the recent Crunchies awards ceremony. Of the companies nominated for the various prizes for excellence in technology awarded there, fully 70 percent were based in San Francisco, Lee noted.

There's a reason why Twitter, Airbnb, and other fast-rising companies worth billions of dollars have located in San Francisco, and it's not just that they save on the money they'd spend on corporate shuttles: It's a great place for their employees to live and work, with an intellectual ferment they cannot find anywhere else.

Here's an ad that Lee showed at the Crunchies, with Square CEO Jack Dorsey and other local figures highlighting the unapologetically boosterish attitude the local tech industry is adopting:

Now, if they can just do something about the trash.

Oh wait—Dorsey is doing something about that, too.

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Twitter Cofounder Jack Dorsey Just Posted His Baby Photos On Vine

$
0
0

Twitter cofounder Jack Dorsey just highlighted a new way to use Vine, his company's app for sharing short, simply edited videos.

He snapped a bunch of old photos of himself, going back to baby pics. It's decades of life in six seconds.

(A tip on Vine videos: If you want to pause a video on the Web or in the mobile app, just click or tap on it to freeze it.)

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Here's Who Will Become Filthy Rich If Square Is Really Worth $3.25 Billion

$
0
0

Jack Dorsey on CNBC

A state filing in Alaska by Square, the San Francisco-based mobile-payments startup, has given us a rare look at a private company's ownership.

Square first reported its ownership to Alaska in 2011. But it just filed a biennial report updating those figures.

The most stunning revelation: Square CEO and cofounder Jack Dorsey now owns 32 percent of the company. In 2011, Square said he owned 28.3 percent.

Square did not provide updated figures for all of its major shareholders. Most venture-capital investors have protective clauses allowing them to reinvest to maintain their proportional stakes. We're assuming those percentage stakes remained the same.

We also assumed that Square is worth $3.25 billion, the valuation assigned it in most recent financing. In a sale or an IPO, investors and founders' stakes might change based on terms that give shareholders additional shares.

Square declined to comment for this story.

Dana Wagner: $5.2 million

Wagner, Square's general counsel and the company's corporate secretary, joined in 2011 from Google, a company known for its generous stock awards. He owns 0.16 percent of the company.



Sarah Friar: $7.2 million

In a good sign for what she can do for Square, Friar, the company's CFO and acting COO, negotiated a good deal for herself. The Goldman veteran, who had a brief stint at Salesforce.com, has only been at the company for eight months, but held a 0.22 percent stake in February. (Her stake was disclosed because she is the company's corporate treasurer.)



Starbucks: $25 million

Starbucks invested $25 million in Square's Series D round last year, as well as striking a deal to let people buy coffee with Square in its thousands of U.S. stores. CEO Howard Schultz joined Square's board.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Jack Dorsey's Stake In Square Is Worth $1 Billion

$
0
0

jack dorsey

It turns out Jack Dorsey doesn't need Twitter's help to enter the billionaire's club.

Business Insider reported last year that Dorsey owned 28.3 percent of Square, the payments startup he cofounded, according to a 2011 filing it had made with the state of Alaska.

After Square raised $200 million at a $3.25 billion valuation, we pegged Dorsey's stake at worth $845 million. His stake in Twitter, a company he also helped found, took him over the $1 billion mark.

But an updated filing in Alaska reports Dorsey as now owning 32 percent of the company.

That means his stake in Square is actually worth $1.04 billion.

How did Dorsey's stake increase to 32 percent, even as Square raised hundreds of millions of dollars in venture capital—which should in theory lower his percentage stake?

There are any number of ways Dorsey could have done it.

But there's one very obvious method, with ample precedent.

In 2005, Facebook's IPO filings revealed, Mark Zuckerberg received an option to buy 120 million shares, in connection with his services as CEO. That option, long since vested, served to protect him against the dilutive effect of Facebook's subsequent fundraising.

So let's assume Dorsey was granted options—probably not long after its founding in 2009. Most of those shares would have vested by now.

It would also make sense, from a tax-planning perspective, for Dorsey to exercise his vested shares before its most recent financing round raised its valuation, since that would lower the tax bill he'd face.

A Square spokesperson declined to comment on Dorsey's increase in ownership between the two filings.

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Jack Dorsey And Other Techies Want More Kids To Learn How To Code (FB, MSFT)

$
0
0

mark zuckerberg in sunglasses

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Square founder Jack Dorsey, Tony Hsieh of Zappos, and singer will.i.am all realize the value in coding.

That's why they're supporting Code.org's efforts to bring more computer science classes to schools, and encourage students to learn how to code. 

In Code.org's latest film short film, "What most schools don't teach," Zuckerberg and other techies talk about their first programming experiences, and the need for more programmers.

"Our policy is literally to hire as many talented engineers as we can find," Zuckerberg says in the video. "The whole limit in the system is just that there just aren't enough people who are trained and have these skills today."

Code.org, a non-profit organization led by Ali and Hadi Partovi, hopes that the film will inspire young people to learn how to code. 

“Enrollment rates in programming classes are low, but what is worse is that schools aren’t even teaching it, even though this is the fastest growing segment of jobs in the country,"Hadi Partovi told TechCrunch's Colleen Taylor.

Nine out of 10 high schools don't offer computer programming classes, according to Code.org. And only in nine states do coding classes actually count toward high school graduation math or science requirements. 

Check out the video below.

SEE ALSO: Someday, Writing Code Could Be As Common As Farming Or Factory Work

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Viewing all 704 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>